About GPT-6 Astra
GPT-6 Astra is OpenAI's most capable GPT-6 model, released on September 3, 2026. It is built for coding, science and long professional tasks, reads up to 1 million tokens of text, images and files and writes up to 128,000 tokens in one reply
GPT-6 Astra scores 96.1% on GPQA Diamond, graduate-level science questions, the best result of 325 models, and 98% on FrontierMath Tier 4, a set of research-level math problems. It is also the strongest GPT-6 model at coding and business workflows, with 59.1% on Terminal-Bench 4.0 and 68.5% on AutomationBench
On Overchat AI, GPT-6 Astra shares the chat with GPT-6.1 Sol, Claude Opus 5.5 and other models: pick it in the model menu, or let Superchat choose the model for each task
- Modalities
- Intelligence Index?
- 57
- Context window?
- 1M tokens
- Released
- Sep 3, 2026
GPT-6 Astra vs other models
GPT-6 Astra ranks #4 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index out of 57 models
- 65
Claude Fable 5.2
- 60
Gemini 4 Carbon
- 59
Claude Opus 5.5
- 57
GPT-6 Astra
- 55
GPT-6.1 Sol
- 50
Muse Wonder Full
- 46
Kimi K3.1 Pro
- 44
Muse Wonder
- 35
Grok 4.7
- 33
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- #1of 325 modelsGPQA DiamondGraduate-level questions in biology, chemistry and physics
- #3of 288 modelsCritPtResearch-level physics problems
- #5of 130 modelsTerminal-Bench 4.0Hard tasks an agent completes in a terminal
- #8of 344 modelsHumanity's Last ExamExpert-level questions across many subjects
Source: Artificial Analysis
Compare GPT-6 Astra
GPT-6 Astra vs GPT-6.1 Sol
GPT-6 Astra scores higher than GPT-6.1 Sol in 4 of 5 benchmarks. The widest lead is in Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1: 63.3% against 58.1%. GPT-6 Astra writes 48 tokens per second, GPT-6.1 Sol writes 58
- Benchmarks won
- GPT-6 Astra: 4
- GPT-6.1 Sol: 1
- Average score
- GPT-6 Astra: 52.9%
- GPT-6.1 Sol: 50.1%
- Output speed, tokens/s
- GPT-6 Astra: 48
- GPT-6.1 Sol: 58
- Time to first token, s (log scale)
- GPT-6 Astra: 3.2
- GPT-6.1 Sol: 2.9
- Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1+5.2
- AutomationBench+3.6
- Terminal-Bench 4.0+3.0
- FrontierCode 2.0+1.8
- GDP.pdf0.0
GPT-6 Astra vs GPT-6.1 Terra
GPT-6 Astra scores higher than GPT-6.1 Terra in 5 of 5 benchmarks. The widest lead is in AutomationBench: 68.5% against 60.2%. GPT-6 Astra writes 48 tokens per second, GPT-6.1 Terra writes 75
- Benchmarks won
- GPT-6 Astra: 5
- GPT-6.1 Terra: 0
- Average score
- GPT-6 Astra: 52.9%
- GPT-6.1 Terra: 48.9%
- Output speed, tokens/s
- GPT-6 Astra: 48
- GPT-6.1 Terra: 75
- Time to first token, s (log scale)
- GPT-6 Astra: 3.2
- GPT-6.1 Terra: 4.3
- AutomationBench+8.3
- Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1+5.7
- Terminal-Bench 4.0+3.5
- GDP.pdf+2.4
- FrontierCode 2.0+0.1
GPT-6 Astra vs Claude Opus 5.5
GPT-6 Astra scores higher than Claude Opus 5.5 in 2 of 5 benchmarks. The widest lead is in GDP.pdf: 31.0% against 26.2%. Claude Opus 5.5 is ahead in FrontierCode 2.0: 46.4% against 42.4%. GPT-6 Astra writes 48 tokens per second, Claude Opus 5.5 writes 88
- Benchmarks won
- GPT-6 Astra: 2
- Claude Opus 5.5: 3
- Average score
- GPT-6 Astra: 52.9%
- Claude Opus 5.5: 52.1%
- Output speed, tokens/s
- GPT-6 Astra: 48
- Claude Opus 5.5: 88
- Time to first token, s (log scale)
- GPT-6 Astra: 3.2
- Claude Opus 5.5: 1.9
- GDP.pdf+4.8
- Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1+4.3
- Terminal-Bench 4.0−0.5
- AutomationBench−1.0
- FrontierCode 2.0−4.0
GPT-6 Astra vs Claude Sonnet 5.5
GPT-6 Astra scores higher than Claude Sonnet 5.5 in 3 of 5 benchmarks. The widest lead is in Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1: 63.3% against 53.3%. Claude Sonnet 5.5 is ahead in Terminal-Bench 4.0: 63.6% against 59.1%. GPT-6 Astra writes 48 tokens per second, Claude Sonnet 5.5 writes 102
- Benchmarks won
- GPT-6 Astra: 3
- Claude Sonnet 5.5: 2
- Average score
- GPT-6 Astra: 52.9%
- Claude Sonnet 5.5: 51.2%
- Output speed, tokens/s
- GPT-6 Astra: 48
- Claude Sonnet 5.5: 102
- Time to first token, s (log scale)
- GPT-6 Astra: 3.2
- Claude Sonnet 5.5: 1.0
- Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1+10.0
- GDP.pdf+5.2
- FrontierCode 2.0+0.7
- AutomationBench−3.3
- Terminal-Bench 4.0−4.5
Best model by use case
Average benchmark scores of GPT-6 Astra and 4 other models by use case
Coding
?Average of 3 tests- 1Claude Opus 5.555.0%
- 2GPT-6 Astra54.9%
- 3Claude Sonnet 5.552.9%
- 4GPT-6.1 Terra51.8%
- 5GPT-6.1 Sol51.6%
Agents
?AutomationBench- 1Claude Sonnet 5.571.8%
- 2Claude Opus 5.569.5%
- 3GPT-6 Astra68.5%
- 4GPT-6.1 Sol64.9%
- 5GPT-6.1 Terra60.2%
Knowledge work
?GDP.pdf- 1GPT-6 Astra31.0%
- 2GPT-6.1 Sol31.0%
- 3GPT-6.1 Terra28.6%
- 4Claude Opus 5.526.2%
- 5Claude Sonnet 5.525.8%
GPT-6 Astra benchmarks
Compare GPT-6 Astra with 4 other models in 6 benchmarks measuring coding, agents and knowledge work
Coding
- Terminal-Bench 4.0?GPT-6 Astra59.1%GPT-6.1 Sol56.1%GPT-6.1 Terra55.6%Claude Opus 5.559.6%Claude Sonnet 5.563.6%59.1%−4.5
- FrontierCode 2.0?GPT-6 Astra42.4%GPT-6.1 Sol40.6%GPT-6.1 Terra42.3%Claude Opus 5.546.4%Claude Sonnet 5.541.7%42.4%−4.0
- Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1?GPT-6 Astra63.3%GPT-6.1 Sol58.1%GPT-6.1 Terra57.6%Claude Opus 5.559.0%Claude Sonnet 5.553.3%63.3%+4.3
Agents
- AutomationBench?GPT-6 Astra68.5%GPT-6.1 Sol64.9%GPT-6.1 Terra60.2%Claude Opus 5.569.5%Claude Sonnet 5.571.8%68.5%−3.3
Knowledge work
- AA-Briefcase?GPT-6 Astra1569.0%GPT-6.1 Sol1555.0%GPT-6.1 Terra1403.0%Claude Opus 5.51801.0%Claude Sonnet 5.51817.0%1569.0%−248.0
- GDP.pdf?GPT-6 Astra31.0%GPT-6.1 Sol31.0%GPT-6.1 Terra28.6%Claude Opus 5.526.2%Claude Sonnet 5.525.8%31.0%+0.0
Sources: OpenAI, GPT-6 Astra: A new generation of intelligence (Sep 3, 2026), Artificial Analysis, GPT-6 Astra
GPT-6 Astra speed
Output speed is how fast the model writes (tokens per second, higher is better). Time to first token is how long you wait before the answer starts (lower is better)
Output speed and time to first token of 35 models
?Percentile| Models | Output speed, tokens/s (log scale) | Time to first token, s (log scale) |
|---|---|---|
| GPT-6 Luna | 143 | 2.4 |
| GPT-6.1 Terra | 75 | 4.3 |
| GPT-6.1 Sol | 58 | 2.9 |
| GPT-6 Astra | 48 | 3.2 |
| Claude Opus 5.5 | 88 | 1.9 |
| Claude Opus 5 | 54 | 2.6 |
| Claude Opus 4.8 | 59 | 1.3 |
| Claude Fable 5.2 | 84 | 2.3 |
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 | 102 | 1 |
| Claude 5 Sonnet | 215 | 10.5 |
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 220 | 10.8 |
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | 167 | 2.1 |
| Gemini 4 Carbon | 169 | 29.5 |
| Gemini 4 Argon | 91 | 6 |
| Gemini 3.8 Flash | 203 | 7.5 |
| Gemini 3 Pro | 270 | 11.2 |
| Grok 4.7 | 81 | 8.9 |
| Grok 4.6 | 290 | 32 |
| Qwen 3.8 Max | 81 | 30.6 |
| DeepSeek V4 Pro | 144 | 1.1 |
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | 422 | 2.2 |
| Mistral Large 4 | 226 | 8.6 |
| Hy4 | 214 | 37.7 |
| ERNIE 5.5 Flash | 405 | 2.7 |
| Muse Wonder | 980 | 8.7 |
| Muse Spark | 1129 | 6.2 |
| Kimi K3.1 Pro | 340 | 7.4 |
| Kimi K3 | 338 | 5.9 |
| GLM 5.3 | 197 | 1.2 |
| Flint | 194 | 12.3 |
| Llama 4 | 81 | 0.7 |
| Claude 4.5 Haiku | 162 | 0.9 |
| MiniMax M3 | 169 | 4.5 |
| MiniMax M3.1 Flash | 656 | 7.2 |
| Kimi K2.7 Code | 455 | 3.6 |
Typing test
Every model writes the same answer. The test waits the model's time to first token, then prints the text at the model's output speed and shows the total time
GPT-6 Astra48 tokens/s3.2 s to first token
GPT-6.1 Sol58 tokens/s2.9 s to first token
GPT-6.1 Terra75 tokens/s4.3 s to first token
Claude Opus 5.588 tokens/s1.9 s to first token
Source: Overchat AI, 2026-11-11
See how GPT-6 Astra answers
Examples of GPT-6 Astra answers to 3 prompts: Review code security, Solve a science problem and Outline a presentation. Each answer is the unedited output of the model
Review this login handler for security problems and fix them. Keep it short. ```js app.post('/login', async (req, res) => { const { email, password } = req.body; const user = await db.query( `SELECT * FROM users WHERE email = '${email}' AND password = '${password}'` ); if (user.rows.length) { res.cookie('session', user.rows[0].id); return res.send('ok'); } res.status(401).send('Wrong email or password for ' + email); }); ```
Problems: SQL injection, plaintext password comparison, forgeable session cookies, reflected input, and no brute-force protection.
Use parameterized queries, Argon2id hashes, and server-side sessions:
// Assumes express-session, argon2, and express-rate-limit are imported.
// sessionStore must be a production Redis/DB store, not MemoryStore.
app.use(session({
secret: process.env.SESSION_SECRET, // required, strong random secret
store: sessionStore,
resave: false,
saveUninitialized: false,
cookie: {
httpOnly: true,
secure: true, // requires HTTPS
sameSite: 'strict',
maxAge: 30 * 60 * 1000
}
}));
const loginLimiter = rateLimit({ windowMs: 15 * 60 * 1000, limit: 10 });
app.post('/login', loginLimiter, async (req, res, next) => {
try {
const { email, password } = req.body ?? {};
if (typeof email !== 'string' || email.length > 254 ||
typeof password !== 'string' || !password.length ||
password.length > 1024) {
return res.status(400).send('Invalid input');
}
const { rows } = await db.query(
'SELECT id, password_hash FROM users WHERE email = $1',
[email]
);
const user = rows[0];
// Precomputed valid Argon2id hash with the same cost as real hashes.
const valid = await argon2.verify(
user?.password_hash ?? DUMMY_HASH, password
);
if (!user || !valid) {
return res.status(401).send('Wrong email or password');
}
req.session.regenerate(err => {
if (err) return next(err);
req.session.userId = user.id;
req.session.save(err => {
if (err) return next(err);
res.send('ok');
});
});
} catch (err) {
next(err);
}
});Migrate existing passwords to Argon2id hashes and remove plaintext storage. Generate DUMMY_HASH once, not per request. Use shared rate-limit storage across instances, add account-based throttling, and configure trusted proxies precisely if behind a load balancer. Production error handling must not expose database errors.
Chemistry homework: how many grams of CO2 form when 50 g of propane (C3H8) burns completely in oxygen? Show the steps.
1. Balance the combustion equation
C₃H₈ + 5O₂ → 3CO₂ + 4H₂O
So, 1 mole of propane produces 3 moles of CO₂.
2. Convert grams of propane to moles
The molar mass of propane is:
M(C₃H₈) = 3(12.01) + 8(1.008) = 44.10 g/mol
n(C₃H₈) = (50 g) / (44.10 g/mol) ≈ 1.134 mol
3. Find the moles of CO₂ produced
Using the mole ratio from the balanced equation:
n(CO₂) = 1.134 × 3 = 3.402 mol
4. Convert moles of CO₂ to grams
The molar mass of CO₂ is 44.01 g/mol:
m(CO₂) = 3.402 mol × 44.01 g/mol ≈ 149.7 g
Approximately 150 g of CO₂
Turn these notes into a 5-slide outline for a board meeting: a title and three short bullets per slide. Q3 revenue $4.2M, up 18% on Q2. Churn went from 3.1% to 2.4% after the new onboarding. Ad spend up 30% but cost per customer down 12%. Hiring: 6 engineers, 2 still open. Risk: our biggest client (14% of revenue) renews in January. Ask: approve $600K for the EU launch in Q1.
1. Q3 Performance
- Revenue reached $4.2M
- Revenue grew 18% versus Q2
- Churn fell from 3.1% to 2.4%
2. Customer Acquisition and Retention
- Ad spend increased 30%
- Cost per customer decreased 12%
- Churn improvement followed new onboarding
3. Engineering Hiring
- Hiring plan: 6 engineers
- 2 positions remain open
- Next focus: fill remaining roles
4. Key Risk: Largest Client Renewal
- Largest client represents 14% of revenue
- Renewal due in January
- Recommended focus: renewal readiness
5. Decision: EU Launch Funding
- EU launch targeted for Q1
- Funding request: $600K
- Board approval requested
More prompts to try with GPT-6 Astra
What GPT-6 Astra is best for
Coding and code review
GPT-6 Astra finds bugs and security holes in code, fixes them and explains each change. It scores 59.1% on Terminal-Bench 4.0, #5 of 130 models, ahead of GPT-6.1 Sol and GPT-6.1 Terra
Science and math
Ask a hard science or math question, and GPT-6 Astra solves it step by step. It scores 96.1% on GPQA Diamond, the best result of 325 models, and 63.3% on Terminal-Bench-Science, ahead of Claude Opus 5.5
Documents and presentations
Give GPT-6 Astra your notes, a report or a long PDF, and it writes slides, summaries and documents that keep your structure. It scores 31.0% on GDP.pdf, questions about long professional PDFs, ahead of Claude Opus 5.5 at 26.2%
Long multi-step tasks
Describe a big task, and GPT-6 Astra plans it step by step and keeps every requirement in view until the end. It scores 68.5% on AutomationBench, a test of business workflows across many apps, ahead of GPT-6.1 Sol at 64.9%
How to use GPT-6 Astra on Overchat AI
Start in the chat at the top of this page or in the Overchat AI app on the web, iOS or Android
- 01

Pick GPT-6 Astra
It is already picked in the chat on this page. In the Overchat AI app, open the model list next to the message field and pick GPT-6 Astra
- 02

Attach your code or a file
Add code, a document, a spreadsheet or a screenshot, and write what you need: the result, the format and what must stay the same
- 03

Keep going in the same chat
Ask a follow-up, ask for tests or a shorter version, or switch to another model without losing the conversation
Why use GPT-6 Astra on Overchat AI
One account for chat, images and video, on every device

Superchat AI agent
Superchat Agent automatically routes your message to the model best suited for the task. It can generate images and videos, use the AI tools built into Overchat AI, and learn from your interactions to get better over time

Chat with images and files
Upload PDFs, spreadsheets, code and screenshots and ask GPT-6 Astra about them. You can also dictate a message instead of typing it

Go beyond text
Generate images with Nano Banana and GPT Image and videos with Seedance and Kling in the same account, with the same credits as chat

GPT models on Overchat AI
Compare 4 GPT models on Overchat AI by output speed, time to first token and the price of one message
Source: Overchat AI, 2026-11-11
Explore other models
Models marked Soon are coming to Overchat AI; the rest are available now
Learn more about AI models

We tested Gemini 4 Argon against Claude Opus 5.5, GPT-6 Astra and Muse Wonder
We tested Gemini 4 Argon against Claude Opus 5.5, GPT-6 Astra and Muse Wonder on three coding tasks. See benchmarks, speed and how to use it

Muse Wonder vs Muse Spark: Meta's New Model Tested
We tested Muse Wonder against Muse Spark 1.3 on logic, writing and coding tasks. See benchmarks and which Meta model is better

10 Best All-in-One AI Platforms in 2026: Why One AI Subscription Beats Many
Compare the 10 best all-in-one AI platforms in 2026, from Overchat AI to Poe and Magai, with prices, free plans and the newest GPT and Claude models
