Claude Opus 5.5

Anthropic's flagship model for long coding jobs, code review and knowledge work, with a 1M-⁠token context window

About Claude Opus 5.5

Claude Opus 5.5 is Anthropic's flagship model for long coding jobs, code review and knowledge work, released on September 22, 2026. It reads up to 1 million tokens of text, code, images and files in one conversation, writes up to 128,000 tokens in one reply and thinks longer on hard problems than on simple ones

Claude Opus 5.5 scores 66.4% on Terminal-Bench 4.0, ahead of GPT-⁠6 Astra at 57.9% and Claude Fable 5.1 at 55.8%, and 1846 Elo on GDPval-AA, a test of real work from 44 occupations. It audits and migrates whole codebases, finds bugs across files and writes short, clear answers with the main point first

On Overchat AI, Claude Opus 5.5 is in one chat with GPT-⁠6, Gemini, Grok and DeepSeek, so you can check an answer with another model without starting a new conversation

Developer
Anthropic
Released
Sep 22, 2026
Context window
1M tokens
Max output
128,000 tokens
Input
Text, images and files
Output
Text
Reasoning
Adaptive thinking, always on
Intelligence Index
59, #3 of 54 models
Available in
Claude apps, Claude Code, Claude API, Amazon Bedrock, Google Cloud, Microsoft Azure, Overchat AI
Modalities
Intelligence Index?
59
Context window?
1M tokens
Released
Sep 22, 2026

Claude Opus 5.5 vs other models

Claude Opus 5.5 ranks #3 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index out of 54 models

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index59#3 of 54 modelsBetter than 94% of 54 models
  1. 65Claude Fable 5.2
  2. 60Gemini 4 Carbon
  3. 59Claude Opus 5.5
  4. 57GPT-6 Astra
  5. 55GPT-6.1 Sol
  6. 50Muse Wonder Full
  7. 46Kimi K3.1 Pro
  8. 44Muse Wonder
  9. 35Grok 4.7
  10. 33DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
  • #2of 136 modelsSciCodePython code for scientific computing66.9%
  • #3of 63 modelsAA-OmniscienceKnowledge questions answered correctly65.5%
  • #3of 288 modelsCritPtResearch-level physics problems31.7%
  • #6of 292 modelsAA-LCRQuestions that need reasoning over very long documents84.7%

Source: Artificial Analysis

Compare Claude Opus 5.5

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Fable 5.1

Claude Opus 5.5 scores higher than Claude Fable 5.1 in 8 of 8 benchmarks. The widest lead is in Terminal-Bench 4.0: 66.4% against 55.8%

Benchmarks won
Claude Opus 5.5: 8
Claude Fable 5.1: 0
Average score
Claude Opus 5.5: 64.5%
Claude Fable 5.1: 59.6%
Claude Fable 5.1 aheadClaude Opus 5.5 ahead
  • Terminal-Bench 4.0+10.6
  • AutomationBench+8.6
  • Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1+6.1
  • CursorBench 4.0+6.0
  • FrontierCode v1.1+4.1
  • Humanity's Last Exam+2.1
  • OSWorld 2.1+1.1
  • Chartography+0.6

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra

Claude Opus 5.5 scores higher than GPT-⁠6 Astra in 3 of 5 benchmarks. The widest lead is in Humanity's Last Exam: 67.7% against 57.2%. GPT-⁠6 Astra is ahead in Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1: 64.6% against 58.7%. Claude Opus 5.5 writes 88 tokens per second, GPT-⁠6 Astra writes 48

Benchmarks won
Claude Opus 5.5: 3
GPT-6 Astra: 2
Average score
Claude Opus 5.5: 57.4%
GPT-6 Astra: 54.9%
Output speed, tokens/s
Claude Opus 5.5: 88
GPT-6 Astra: 48
Time to first token, s (log scale)
Claude Opus 5.5: 1.9
GPT-6 Astra: 3.2
GPT-6 Astra aheadClaude Opus 5.5 ahead
  • Humanity's Last Exam+10.5
  • Terminal-Bench 4.0+8.5
  • FrontierCode v1.1+1.1
  • AutomationBench−1.4
  • Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1−5.9
  • CursorBench 4.0—
  • OSWorld 2.1—
  • Chartography—

Best model by use case

Average benchmark scores of Claude Opus 5.5 and 2 other models by use case

  • Coding

    ?
    Average of 3 tests
    1. 1Claude Opus 5.559.8%
    2. 2GPT-6 Astra58.6%
    3. 3Claude Fable 5.152.9%
  • Agents

    ?
    AutomationBench
    1. 1GPT-6 Astra41.4%
    2. 2Claude Opus 5.540.0%
    3. 3Claude Fable 5.131.4%
  • Knowledge work

    ?
    Humanity's Last Exam
    1. 1Claude Opus 5.567.7%
    2. 2Claude Fable 5.165.6%
    3. 3GPT-6 Astra57.2%

Claude Opus 5.5 benchmarks

Compare Claude Opus 5.5 with Claude Fable 5.1 and GPT-⁠6 Astra in 9 benchmarks measuring coding, agents and knowledge work

Order

Coding

  • Terminal-Bench 4.0?Claude Opus 5.566.4%Claude Fable 5.155.8%GPT-6 Astra57.9%66.4%+8.5
  • FrontierCode v1.1?Claude Opus 5.554.4%Claude Fable 5.150.3%GPT-6 Astra53.3%54.4%+1.1
  • CursorBench 4.0?Claude Opus 5.557.8%Claude Fable 5.151.8%GPT-6 Astra—57.8%+6.0
  • Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1?Claude Opus 5.558.7%Claude Fable 5.152.6%GPT-6 Astra64.6%58.7%−5.9

Agents

  • OSWorld 2.1?Claude Opus 5.581.8%Claude Fable 5.180.7%GPT-6 Astra—81.8%+1.1
  • AutomationBench?Claude Opus 5.540.0%Claude Fable 5.131.4%GPT-6 Astra41.4%40.0%−1.4

Knowledge work

  • GDPval-AA v2.1?Claude Opus 5.51846.0%Claude Fable 5.11735.0%GPT-6 Astra1542.0%1846.0%+111.0
  • Humanity's Last Exam?Claude Opus 5.567.7%Claude Fable 5.165.6%GPT-6 Astra57.2%67.7%+2.1
  • Chartography?Claude Opus 5.589.0%Claude Fable 5.188.4%GPT-6 Astra—89.0%+0.6

Sources: Anthropic, Introducing Claude Opus 5.5 (Sep 22, 2026), Artificial Analysis, Claude Opus 5.5

Claude Opus 5.5 speed

Output speed is how fast the model writes (tokens per second, higher is better). Time to first token is how long you wait before the answer starts (lower is better)

Output speed and time to first token of 35 models

?Percentile
Time to first token, s (log scale)
Output speed, tokens/s (log scale)
Output speed and time to first token of 35 models
ModelsOutput speed, tokens/s (log scale)Time to first token, s (log scale)
GPT-6 Luna1432.4
GPT-6.1 Terra754.3
GPT-6.1 Sol582.9
GPT-6 Astra483.2
Claude Opus 5.5881.9
Claude Opus 5542.6
Claude Opus 4.8591.3
Claude Fable 5.2842.3
Claude Sonnet 5.51021
Claude 5 Sonnet21510.5
Claude Sonnet 4.622010.8
Claude Haiku 5.51672.1
Gemini 4 Carbon16929.5
Gemini 4 Argon916
Gemini 3.8 Flash2037.5
Gemini 3 Pro27011.2
Grok 4.7818.9
Grok 4.629032
Qwen 3.8 Max8130.6
DeepSeek V4 Pro1441.1
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash4222.2
Mistral Large 42268.6
Hy421437.7
ERNIE 5.5 Flash4052.7
Muse Wonder9808.7
Muse Spark11296.2
Kimi K3.1 Pro3407.4
Kimi K33385.9
GLM 5.31971.2
Flint19412.3
Llama 4810.7
Claude 4.5 Haiku1620.9
MiniMax M31694.5
MiniMax M3.1 Flash6567.2
Kimi K2.7 Code4553.6

Typing test

Every model writes the same answer. The test waits the model's time to first token, then prints the text at the model's output speed and shows the total time

Answer length
  • Claude Opus 5.588 tokens/s1.9 s to first token
  • GPT-6 Astra48 tokens/s3.2 s to first token

Source: Overchat AI, 2026-11-11

See how Claude Opus 5.5 answers

Examples of Claude Opus 5.5 answers to 3 prompts: Find a bug, Summarize a thread and Check the numbers. Each answer is the unedited output of the model

This function should return the total usage for a billing month, but customers say the last day of the month is never billed. Find the bug, explain it in two sentences and give the fixed code. ```python from datetime import datetime, timedelta def month_bounds(year, month): start = datetime(year, month, 1) nxt = datetime(year + month // 12, month % 12 + 1, 1) return start, nxt - timedelta(days=1) def monthly_usage(events, year, month): start, end = month_bounds(year, month) return sum(e.amount for e in events if start <= e.ts <= end) ```

Claude Opus 5.5

Bug: month_bounds returns nxt - timedelta(days=1) as the end bound, which is midnight at the start of the last day (e.g. 2024-01-31 00:00:00), not the end of it. Because the filter uses e.ts <= end, every event after 00:00:00 on the last day is excluded, so that day's usage is effectively never billed.

Fix: Use a half-open interval [start of month, start of next month).

python
from datetime import datetime

def month_bounds(year, month):
    start = datetime(year, month, 1)
    nxt = datetime(year + month // 12, month % 12 + 1, 1)
    return start, nxt  # end is exclusive: first instant of next month

def monthly_usage(events, year, month):
    start, end = month_bounds(year, month)
    return sum(e.amount for e in events if start <= e.ts < end)

The half-open interval also avoids precision problems that come with an inclusive end such as 23:59:59, which would miss events with microseconds after that second. The existing year-rollover logic for December is correct and stays unchanged.

Summarize this Slack thread for my manager in three short bullet points: the problem, what's fixed and what's left. Lena: The checkout page broke for Safari users after Tuesday's release. About 12% of orders failed for two days. Omar: The cause is a date-picker library update. I rolled it back this morning and Safari checkouts work again. Lena: Support has 340 tickets about failed payments. Can we refund the extra charges? Mei: Finance confirmed 58 customers were charged twice. Refunds go out today. Omar: I'm adding a Safari run to our release tests so this can't ship again. Ready by Friday. Lena: I'll email the affected customers a 10% coupon once the refunds land.

Claude Opus 5.5
  • Problem: Tuesday's release broke checkout for Safari users, and about 12% of orders failed over two days. The cause was a date-picker library update. Support has received 340 tickets, and 58 customers were charged twice.
  • Fixed: Omar rolled back the library update this morning, and Safari checkouts are working again.
  • Still to do: Finance is sending refunds to the 58 double-charged customers today. Omar is adding Safari to release testing to prevent a repeat, due Friday. Lena will email affected customers a 10% coupon once the refunds land.

Our startup has $1.1M in the bank, $40k monthly revenue growing 8% a month, and $120k monthly costs that stay flat. In which month do we break even, and do we run out of money before that? Show the math in a short table.

Claude Opus 5.5

Break-even in Month 16, with about $386k left at the low point

Assumptions: Month 1 revenue is $40k, and revenue grows 8% each month after that. Costs stay flat at $120k/month.

Break-even condition: 40 × 1.08ⁿ⁻¹ ≥ 120 → 1.08ⁿ⁻¹ ≥ 3 → n − 1 ≥ ln 3 / ln 1.08 ≈ 14.3 → n = 16

Month Revenue ($k) Costs ($k) Net ($k) Cash End ($k)
1 40.0 120 −80.0 1,020.0
2 43.2 120 −76.8 943.2
3 46.7 120 −73.3 869.9
4 50.4 120 −69.6 800.2
5 54.4 120 −65.6 734.7
6 58.8 120 −61.2 673.4
7 63.5 120 −56.5 616.9
8 68.6 120 −51.4 565.5
9 74.0 120 −46.0 519.5
10 80.0 120 −40.0 479.5
11 86.4 120 −33.6 445.8
12 93.3 120 −26.7 419.1
13 100.7 120 −19.3 399.8
14 108.8 120 −11.2 388.6
15 117.5 120 −2.5 386.1 (low point)
16 126.9 120 +6.9 393.0

Total burn before break-even is about $714k. Over months 1–15, revenue sums to 40 × (1.08¹⁵ − 1)/0.08 ≈ $1,086k, against $1,800k in costs.

Answer: You break even in Month 16 (or Month 15 if the 8% growth starts next month). You don't run out of money. Cash bottoms out around $386k, which is roughly 35% of what you have now.

Sensitivity: The cushion is real but depends on growth holding up. At about 5% monthly growth, break-even slips to around Month 24 and the cash runs out before you get there.

More prompts to try with Claude Opus 5.5

What Claude Opus 5.5 is best for

  • Long coding jobs

    Claude Opus 5.5 takes on migrations, audits and refactors that span a whole codebase and keeps working until the tests pass. It scores 66.4% on Terminal-Bench 4.0 and 57.8% on CursorBench 4.0, ahead of Claude Fable 5.1 and Opus 5

  • Code review and bug fixing

    Paste a diff or attach a file, and Opus 5.5 points to the line that breaks, explains why in plain words and writes the fix. It looks past the first plausible cause and checks how the parts of the code fit together

  • Reports, models and analysis

    Give Opus 5.5 notes, numbers and documents, and it returns a report, a financial model or a slide outline. It scores 1846 Elo on GDPval-AA, ahead of Claude Fable 5.1 at 1735 and GPT-⁠6 Astra at 1542

  • Clear summaries

    Opus 5.5 writes short answers with the most important point first and no jargon, so a long thread, a meeting or a report turns into a summary your manager reads in a minute

How to use Claude Opus 5.5 on Overchat AI

Start in the chat at the top of this page or in the Overchat AI app on the web, iOS or Android

  1. The Models menu with Claude Opus 5.5 picked
    01

    Pick Claude Opus 5.5

    It is already picked in the chat on this page. In the Overchat AI app, open the model list next to the message field and pick Claude Opus 5.5

  2. Message field with a file attached and a request
    02

    Attach your code or a file

    Add code, a document, a spreadsheet or a screenshot, and write what you need: the result, the format and what must stay the same

  3. Claude Opus 5.5's answer and a follow-up
    03

    Keep going in the same chat

    Ask a follow-up, ask for tests or a shorter version, or switch to another model without losing the conversation

Why use Claude Opus 5.5 on Overchat AI

One account for chat, images and video, on every device

Superchat picked over Claude Opus 5.5: one request done by Claude Opus 5.5 (the plan) and Nano Banana 2.1 (the poster)

Superchat AI agent

Superchat Agent automatically routes your message to the model best suited for the task. It can generate images and videos, use the AI tools built into Overchat AI, and learn from your interactions to get better over time

Message field with a PDF, a spreadsheet and a dashboard screenshot attached, Claude Opus 5.5 picked and a voice message being recorded

Chat with images and files

Upload PDFs, spreadsheets, code and screenshots and ask Claude Opus 5.5 about them. You can also dictate a message instead of typing it

An image made with Nano Banana 2.1 and a surfing video made with Seedance 2.5

Go beyond text

Generate images with Nano Banana and GPT Image and videos with Seedance and Kling in the same account, with the same credits as chat

Overchat AI on the web and iPhone, and the Superchat screen of the iPhone app

On the web and iPhone

Start a chat on your laptop and finish it on your phone. The Overchat AI app has the same models, and your chats stay in one account on every device

Download on the App Store

Claude models on Overchat AI

Compare 9 Claude models on Overchat AI by output speed, time to first token and the price of one message

Models
Output speed, tokens/s
First token, s
Credits per message?
Claude Opus 5.5This page
88
1.9
110
54
2.6
110
59
1.3
110
84
2.3
220
Claude Sonnet 5.5
102
1.0
4
215
10.5
4
Claude Sonnet 4.6
220
10.8
2
Claude Haiku 5.5
167
2.1
2
Claude 4.5 Haiku
162
0.9
2

Source: Overchat AI, 2026-11-11

Explore other models

Models marked Soon are coming to Overchat AI; the rest are available now

Learn more about AI models

All articles

Ready to try Claude Opus 5.5?

Ask your first question or attach a file, and Claude Opus 5.5 answers in the Overchat AI chat

Chat with Claude Opus 5.5

Claude Opus 5.5 FAQ

If you have any questions,
reach out to us at hello@overchat.ai

Claude Opus 5.5 is Anthropic's flagship model for coding, agents and knowledge work, released on September 22, 2026. It is the first model of the Claude 5.5 family. It reads up to 1 million tokens of text, code, images and files and writes up to 128,000 tokens in one reply

Yes, on every test the two were run on: 66.4% on Terminal-Bench 4.0 against 52.3% for Opus 5, 1846 Elo on GDPval-AA against 1708 and 58.7% on Terminal-Bench-Science against 29.0%. Opus 5.5 also writes more than 30% faster than Opus 5 and finishes the same task in fewer steps

At coding and knowledge work, yes: Opus 5.5 scores 66.4% on Terminal-Bench 4.0 against 57.9% for GPT-⁠6 Astra and 1846 Elo on GDPval-AA against 1542. GPT-⁠6 Astra is ahead on science tasks, with 64.6% on Terminal-Bench-Science against 58.7%, and slightly ahead on AutomationBench, 41.4% against 40.0%

Opus 5.5 is the stronger model: it scores 59 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index against 55 for Sonnet 5.5, with the biggest lead on expert questions and science tasks. Sonnet 5.5 answers faster and costs fewer credits on Overchat AI, so it suits everyday questions, while Opus 5.5 suits long coding jobs and hard analysis

Yes. Opus 5.5 reads text, images and files such as PDFs, spreadsheets and code and answers in text. It scores 89.0% on Chartography, a test of questions about charts. It doesn't make pictures: for an image, switch to Nano Banana 2.1 or GPT Image 2.6 in the same chat

Yes. Opus 5.5 works in the Claude apps, Claude Code and the Claude API, and on Amazon Bedrock, Google Cloud and Microsoft Azure. On Overchat AI you chat with it on the web and in the iOS and Android apps

Claude Opus 5.5 reads up to 1 million tokens in one conversation, about 750,000 words, and writes up to 128,000 tokens in one reply

Type your message in the chat at the top of this page, attach a file if you need to and press Send. After you sign in, Claude Opus 5.5 answers in the Overchat AI chat, where you can keep the conversation going on the web, iOS or Android and switch to another model at any time