/
How do AI Detectors Work: Deep-Dive into Techniques and Accuracy
Last Updated:
Jul 10, 2025

How do AI Detectors Work: Deep-Dive into Techniques and Accuracy

AI detectors (also called AI writing detectors or AI content detectors) are tools designed to detect when a text was partially or entirely generated by artificial intelligence (AI) tools such as ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini.

AI detectors are quite new and experimental, and they're generally considered somewhat unreliable for now. Understanding how AI detectors work is important for interpreting their results correctly and knowing when to trust them.

Below, we explain exactly how AI detectors work, their accuracy rates, and how they're being used across different industries.

What are AI detectors?

AI detectors are software tools that analyze text to determine whether it was written by a human or generated by an AI writing tool. These detectors use machine learning algorithms to identify patterns that distinguish AI-generated content from human writing.

Common AI detectors include:

  • Overchat AI detector
  • Turnitin's AI detection feature
  • GPTZero
  • Originality.ai
  • Copyleaks AI detector
  • QuillBot's AI detector

These tools are designed for various users:

  • Educators checking student work
  • Content managers verifying articles
  • Recruiters reviewing cover letters
  • And anyone else who needs to identify AI-generated text.

However, it's important to note that no AI detector is 100% accurate, and they should be used as one tool among many for assessing text authenticity.

How do AI detectors work?

AI detectors work by using machine learning and natural language processing (NLP) to analyze text patterns.

These tools essentially ask: "Is this the sort of text that an AI would write?" If the answer is yes, they flag the content as likely AI-generated.

But to understand how AI detectors work, it's important to first understand how generative AI creates text.

AI writing tools predict what word should come next in a sentence based on patterns they've learned from massive datasets. This predictability is exactly what AI detectors look for.

AI detectors are usually based on language models similar to those used in the AI writing tools they're trying to detect. They're trained on large datasets of both human-written and AI-generated texts, learning to recognize the subtle differences between them.

The detection process involves several key components that work together to classify text:

  • Machine learning models analyze the input text and compare it to patterns they've learned during training. These models look for statistical patterns that are characteristic of AI-generated content.
  • Natural language processing breaks down the text into smaller units—words, phrases, sentences—and examines how these units relate to each other. This analysis reveals patterns in language use that differ between humans and AI.

The specific technical methods AI detectors use include analyzing classifiers, embeddings, perplexity, and burstiness — which we'll explore in detail in the following sections.

Classifiers

A classifier is a machine learning model that categorizes input data into predetermined classes. For AI detectors, these classes are AI-written and human-written.

Classifiers work through a training process where data engineers feed them large datasets that have already been labeled as being written by AI or by a human. The classifier analyzes features like word usage frequency, sentence length, and complexity in these different classes of data.

When you submit a new text to an AI detector, the classifier evaluates the same features it learned during training. It looks for patterns like:

  • Word choice predictability
  • Sentence structure consistency
  • Grammatical complexity
  • Vocabulary diversity

Based on these patterns, the classifier decides whether the text is AI or human generated.

This classification process happens in milliseconds, allowing AI detectors to analyze texts quickly and provide immediate results about whether content is likely AI-generated or human-written.

Embeddings

Embeddings translate human language into numerical representations that computers can process.

Since computers can't understand the meaning of words directly, embeddings convert words into vectors — multi-dimensional numbers that capture meaning, structure, and context.

These numerical representations allow AI detectors to recognize relationships between words. For example, king and queen would have similar vectors because they share related meanings. The word bear would have different vectors when referring to an animal versus its use in bear in mind.

AI detectors use embeddings to understand the deeper patterns in how words relate to each other, helping them identify whether these patterns match human or AI writing styles.

Perplexity

Perplexity measures how predictable a text is — essentially, how likely it is to confuse or surprise the average reader. AI detectors analyze perplexity as a key indicator of whether text is AI-generated.

AI language models aim to produce texts with low perplexity, creating content that flows smoothly and makes logical sense. Human writing typically has higher perplexity due to creative language choices, unexpected word combinations, and occasional typos or errors.

Low perplexity suggests AI generation because AI tools consistently choose the most probable next word.

Burstiness

Burstiness is the variation in sentence structure and length throughout a text. 

Human writing typically shows high burstiness — mixing short sentences with long, complex ones. Writers naturally vary their sentence patterns to create rhythm and maintain reader interest.

AI-generated text tends to have low burstiness. AI likes to write sentences of similar length and structure. Because AI models predict the most likely words and structures, they often create monotonous patterns.

A potential alternative: Watermarks

OpenAI, the company behind ChatGPT, claims to be working on a watermarking system for AI-generated text.

This system would embed an invisible watermark into text created by AI tools, which could then be detected by specialized software to confirm the text's AI origin.

The proposed watermarking would work by subtly adjusting word choices in AI-generated text according to a secret pattern. These adjustments would be imperceptible to readers but detectable by watermark-reading tools, a definitive proof that text was AI-generated.

However, this watermarking system has not been implemented yet, and important questions remain unanswered:

  • Will watermarks survive when AI-generated text is edited or paraphrased?
  • How will the system handle translations or major rewrites?
  • What happens if multiple AI tools develop incompatible watermarking systems?

While watermarking could potentially solve many AI detection challenges, it remains a theoretical solution. Until these systems are developed and widely adopted, we must rely on current AI detection methods with all their limitations.

How reliable are AI detectors?

No AI detector is 100% reliable. In testing, the highest accuracy found was 84% for premium tools and 68% for the best free tools. This means even the best AI detectors make mistakes in roughly 1 out of 6 cases.

AI detectors commonly produce two types of errors:

False positives occur when human-written text is incorrectly flagged as AI-generated. This happens because humans sometimes write in predictable patterns that match AI writing characteristics—especially in technical or formal writing.

False negatives happen when AI-generated text passes as human-written. Sophisticated AI outputs, especially those edited by humans or prompted to be more creative, often evade detection.

Factors that affect AI detector reliability are:

  • Text length (shorter texts are harder to analyze accurately)
  • Writing style (formal, technical writing often triggers false positives)
  • Post-generation editing (human edits can mask AI patterns)
  • AI model sophistication (newer AI models are harder to detect)

AI detectors work best with longer texts and should be treated as indicators rather than definitive proof. Most providers acknowledge their tools cannot serve as conclusive evidence that text is AI-generated.

Is the Overchat AI detector accurate?

The Overchat AI detector uses advanced classification methods to analyze text, but like all AI detectors, it has limitations. It performs with 83% accuracy, making it one of the best AI detectors available for free.

Overchat's detection system analyzes multiple text features including perplexity, burstiness, and linguistic patterns. The tool provides probability scores rather than definitive yes/no answers.

  • Results are most reliable with texts over 150 words
  • Academic and technical writing may trigger false positives
  • Edited AI content may evade detection
  • Probability scores should guide further investigation, not serve as final judgment

Limitations of AI detectors

Before you decide to trust an AI detector, you need to understand that these tools have several significant limitations.

Text length: AI detectors need at least 150-200 words to work properly. Shorter texts don't give the detector enough patterns to analyze, which leads to unreliable results.

Language and style bias: AI detectors often incorrectly flag:

  • Non-native English writing as AI-generated
  • Technical or scientific writing due to its formal structure
  • Creative writing that uses repetition for effect
  • Translated texts that have unusual phrasing

New AI models: AI writing tools get better every day. GPT-4.5 writes more naturally than GPT-4o, and newer models will be even harder to detect. AI detectors can't always keep up with these improvements.

Easy ways to trick detectors: People can make AI text undetectable by:

  • Adding spelling mistakes or typos on purpose
  • Mixing AI and human writing together
  • Running AI text through paraphrasing tools
  • Asking AI to write with more variety and creativity

Can't detect AI-assisted writing: If someone uses AI for ideas, outlines, or editing but writes the final text themselves, AI detectors won't catch it. They only find fully AI-generated content.

AI detectors vs. plagiarism checkers

AI detectors and plagiarism checkers serve different purposes, though both help identify academic dishonesty. Understanding their differences helps you choose the right tool for your needs.

What they detect:

  • AI detectors identify text written by AI tools like ChatGPT
  • Plagiarism checkers find text copied from other sources

How they work:

  • AI detectors analyze writing patterns, perplexity, and burstiness
  • Plagiarism checkers compare text against databases of published work

What triggers them:

  • AI detectors flag predictable, low-variation writing
  • Plagiarism checkers flag matching text from their databases

Plagiarism checkers sometimes catch AI writing because, AI tools may copy sentences from their training data, multiple people using AI for the same topic produce similar text, or because

AI doesn't cite sources it draws from.

What are AI detectors used for?

AI detectors are used by anyone who needs to check if text was written by AI. Different professionals use these tools for different reasons.

Educators use AI detectors to check student work. When a student submits an essay or assignment, teachers want to know if the student actually wrote it or if they used ChatGPT. This helps teachers understand who needs help with writing skills and maintains fairness in grading.

Publishers and content managers need to verify that articles are human-written. Many publications have policies against AI-generated content, so editors check submissions before publishing. This protects their reputation for original, authentic content.

Recruiters check job applications for AI use. They want to see a candidate's actual writing skills, not what ChatGPT can produce. Cover letters and writing samples that are AI-generated don't show the applicant's true abilities.

Website owners and content creators test their content before publishing. Google and other search engines may rank AI-generated content lower, so creators check their work to avoid penalties.

Best practices for using AI detectors

To use AI detectors effectively, follow these key practices.

  • Use at least 2-3 different AI detectors. When multiple detectors flag the same text, the results are more reliable.
  • If you only have a paragraph, try to get more writing samples before testing.
  • Consider the type of writing before trusting detector results.
  • Treat high scores as reasons to investigate further, not as final answers.
  • Check for updates to your detection tools and read about new detection techniques.

FAQ

How accurate are AI detectors?

The best AI detectors are about 84% accurate. Free tools are less accurate, around 68%. This means even good detectors get it wrong about 1 in 6 times. Never rely on them alone for important decisions.

How can I detect AI writing?

Use AI detection tools, but also look for signs yourself. AI writing often repeats the same words, sounds overly polite, and uses phrases like "it's important to note." Check if facts are real. Notice if someone's writing style suddenly changes.

Can I cite ChatGPT?

Yes, you can cite ChatGPT in academic work. But check your school's rules first. Each university has different policies about using and citing AI. Most require you to clearly state when you used AI help.

What do teachers use to detect AI?

Teachers use tools like Turnitin, GPTZero, and Originality.ai. They also compare your new work to your old work. Many ask students to explain their writing in person. Some check if your sources are real.

How long will ChatGPT be free?

The basic ChatGPT is still free, but this might change. OpenAI already charges for advanced features. The free version has limits on how much you can use it. Newer AI models usually cost money.

Can AI write code?

Yes, ChatGPT and other AI tools can write code in Python, JavaScript, and other languages. But the code often has bugs. You need to test and fix it before using it. Don't trust AI code without reviewing it first.